Power Line News

A stable, democratic Iraq is very possible, with evidence mounting in that regard every month.  A US military presence in Iraq for the forseeable future, providing security support, is not only probable, it’s the responsible thing to do.  Where is the mystery and controversy?

“A stable, democratic Iraq, with no violence, and an end to terrorist attacks around the world.” You think that’s “ridiculous garbage”?

Yes, Vlad, it’s ridiculous garbage and you know it is.

Are you off your meds? There’s not a word in there that George W. Bush and Condoleeza Rice would disagree with.

vladimir estragon - 30 May 2008 01:54 PM

“A stable, democratic Iraq, with no violence, and an end to terrorist attacks around the world.” You think that’s “ridiculous garbage”?

Yes, Vlad, it’s ridiculous garbage and you know it is.

Are you off your meds? There’s not a word in there that George W. Bush and Condoleeza Rice would disagree with.

It’s you who is off the meds.  Neither Bush nor Rice would ever say, “...with no violence”, or “...and end to terrorist attacks around the world”.  They would, however, agree with my statement.  Get a grip.