A couple revealing comments from the utterly distasteful thread…
The rich live at our expense.
So the sins of Prescott Bush…
... and the other Nazi “Bushes” are irrelevant to GW’s leadership?
The whole Bush family and their history is a disgrace.
Any scorn directed their way is greatly deserved; even on Jenna’s “special day.”
The Bush Crime Family is just that.
On the day before Jenna’s wedding, late at night on that friday; The Bush White House dumped even more documents that give the Executive even more secret powers.
I would say that the Bush Crime Family used Jenna’s wedding to obscure that document dump; the media’s attnetion was on Jenna’s dress and the man-made lake. Little about new Secret Powers. If her own family will use her wedding for politics, then it is fair game for those of us who want this family charged, convicted and incarcerated.
Warning. Contains President Bush standing next to a cross.
Jenna and Daddy share the same smirky chimp mugg.
To be fair, there were several kos posters who called this “diarist” to the carpet for poor taste. But this brand of hateful Leftism has begun to make many inroads into the Democrat party. The entirety of congressional Democrats are expected to attend the “yearlykos” convention.
A couple revealing comments from the utterly distasteful thread…
The rich live at our expense.
So the sins of Prescott Bush…
... and the other Nazi “Bushes” are irrelevant to GW’s leadership?
The whole Bush family and their history is a disgrace.
Any scorn directed their way is greatly deserved; even on Jenna’s “special day.”
The Bush Crime Family is just that.
On the day before Jenna’s wedding, late at night on that friday; The Bush White House dumped even more documents that give the Executive even more secret powers.
I would say that the Bush Crime Family used Jenna’s wedding to obscure that document dump; the media’s attnetion was on Jenna’s dress and the man-made lake. Little about new Secret Powers. If her own family will use her wedding for politics, then it is fair game for those of us who want this family charged, convicted and incarcerated.
Warning. Contains President Bush standing next to a cross.
Jenna and Daddy share the same smirky chimp mugg.
To be fair, there were several kos posters who called this “diarist” to the carpet for poor taste. But this brand of hateful Leftism has begun to make many inroads into the Democrat party. The entirety of congressional Democrats are expected to attend the “yearlykos” convention.
Yes there were some who objected to this, but they were howled down by the “reality based community”. You know, the ones who hold dissent in such high regard until it is turned against them, then they seek to squelch it.
A couple revealing comments from the utterly distasteful thread…
The rich live at our expense.
So the sins of Prescott Bush…
... and the other Nazi “Bushes” are irrelevant to GW’s leadership?
The whole Bush family and their history is a disgrace.
Any scorn directed their way is greatly deserved; even on Jenna’s “special day.”
The Bush Crime Family is just that.
On the day before Jenna’s wedding, late at night on that friday; The Bush White House dumped even more documents that give the Executive even more secret powers.
I would say that the Bush Crime Family used Jenna’s wedding to obscure that document dump; the media’s attnetion was on Jenna’s dress and the man-made lake. Little about new Secret Powers. If her own family will use her wedding for politics, then it is fair game for those of us who want this family charged, convicted and incarcerated.
Warning. Contains President Bush standing next to a cross.
Jenna and Daddy share the same smirky chimp mugg.
To be fair, there were several kos posters who called this “diarist” to the carpet for poor taste. But this brand of hateful Leftism has begun to make many inroads into the Democrat party. The entirety of congressional Democrats are expected to attend the “yearlykos” convention.
Yes there were some who objected to this, but they were howled down by the “reality based community”. You know, the ones who hold dissent in such high regard until it is turned against them, then they seek to squelch it.
I’m always interested in clarity Thresh. I know what you’re saying, but I think the kossacks who opposed this base example of BDS were at least 30% - 40%, and shouted back at those who defended it.
The greater point is that the dailykos mentality is becoming the mainstream of the Democrat party, and the dailykos is heavily populated by this kind of thuggery - it is the norm there, and dissenters are swallowed by the haters.
I meant “swallowed” figuratively, but at second glance, probably literally in some cases as well.
Another point the poster of the Kos thread topic is not a newbie false flag positing.
If you click the name of the person posting the original post his bio will show over 600 recommended threads in his history, his posts are well above that, so it is a regular poster there and not a shill hit and run.
I’m always interested in clarity Thresh. I know what you’re saying, but I think the kossacks who opposed this base example of BDS were at least 30% - 40%, and shouted back at those who defended it.
The greater point is that the dailykos mentality is becoming the mainstream of the Democrat party, and the dailykos is heavily populated by this kind of thuggery - it is the norm there, and dissenters are swallowed by the haters.
I meant “swallowed” figuratively, but at second glance, probably literally in some cases as well.
I congratulate on you abilty to wade through the muck to come up with those figures. For myself, I quit following the thread when I start seeing posts like this one by jj24.
Considering the fact that the time span between my original post and the initial reply was about 6 minutes, it is interesting that he was able to review I guess the content of the linked thread and then somehow find an obscure quote of mine from a while back to use for the reply.
Now this board is not real rapid response even with the search function and at least a portion of the quote would have to be remembered to search for the reference.
One would almost conclude the quote used had been stored away for use when deemed.
I find that interesting.
EDIT
I searched for the string in question even via google and only find references to this thread and a composite of similar comments that vlad had posted in another thread. Checking to see if I can still find the original posting of the commment. The january post by vlad includes multiple quotes and does not identify who posted them.
Vlad is just upset that his side has displayed their bottomfeeder mentality again and he can’t bring himself to reject it.
Remember this “can’t bring himself to reject it” when the ‘tards show surprise and indignation at being portrayed as complicit and supportive of this leftist garbage.
Of course they can help themselves, they choose not to.
I think we all agree that a small portion of the military is at war and the rest of the country is at the mall...shopping for weddings and stuff like that.
I think she’s a beautiful bride but honestly I don’t think that particular gown does anything for her. With her hair down and that full, I think she would have been better complemented in a strapless gown.
Considering the fact that the time span between my original post and the initial reply was about 6 minutes, it is interesting that he was able to review I guess the content of the linked thread and then somehow find an obscure quote of mine from a while back to use for the reply.
Now this board is not real rapid response even with the search function and at least a portion of the quote would have to be remembered to search for the reference.
One would almost conclude the quote used had been stored away for use when deemed.
I find that interesting.
EDIT
I searched for the string in question even via google and only find references to this thread and a composite of similar comments that vlad had posted in another thread. Checking to see if I can still find the original posting of the commment. The january post by vlad includes multiple quotes and does not identify who posted them.
The chap in question ("vladimir estragon") is a “collector”, and has been one for quite some time on this forum.
As in, most recently (highlights mine):
vladimir estragon - 12 May 2008 04:49 PM
...
Would you like to see some selections from my extensive collection of right-wing Powerliners ... ?
Now, ain’t you just itchin’ to ask him the obvious question(s)?
OK. Let me start:
Hey, “vladimir estragon”! Yooo-hooo!
Given your penchance for collecting “notable quotes”, you no doubt have a sizeable and “ready-to-deploy” list of quotes from Left-wing Powerliners”, right?
Well, then, would you kindly provide us all with what may be described as “The Top 10 Most Objectionable/Offensive/Vile/"I hope these people don’t vote” kind of quotes from said group?
