Obama Has had the good fortune in this campaign of having some of the weakest opponents possible and the good favor of the press. In fact it seems that they have been in the tank for Barry since he first announced. After all, instead of proving your lack of racist feelings by you know, actually interacting with black people, you can get your chops on the cheap by just vocally supporting the black guy in front of your white friends.
Diplomacy without the threat of force is nothing but hot air. Not one of your opponents will believe anything you say, and have no reason to negotiate. The threat of force is never going to be credible with Obama because he has already said that he eschews force in dealing with other nations before he ever sits down with them. International politics is not beanbag.
no difference if you are drunk, mentally handicapped, or both.
Well then, what’s the difference?
The coward’s way out is to post a cartoon, a snarky reply, or a silly picture of Hillary Clinton.
I will concede that a Hillary cartoon might seem “snarky” to those with extreme liberal sensitivities.
With that in mind, we can take the “snark” out of the visual aid and offer a clip that both addresses the question raised regarding sobriety and mental acuity, and delivers some sage and timely advice:
no difference if you are drunk, mentally handicapped, or both.
Well then, what’s the difference?
The coward’s way out is to post a cartoon, a snarky reply, or a silly picture of Hillary Clinton. Someone with courage actually will take the time to clearly state the difference between Bin Laden’s 2004 endorsement of Bush and Hamas enjoying the thought of an Obama presidency.
Are you up to it? Probably not.
I don’t waste my time explaining the obvious to nitwits like yourself. Particularly those who post a pathetic snark, then are offended by snarky responses. Grow up, sophie. You aren’t even a good troll.
Further, if by now you cannot tell the difference between the Osama “endorsement” of a man (assuming, of course, that Osama still lived) leading the world-wide war to eradicate Osama and his band of terrorists from Hamas endorsing a politician who uses Hamas supporters as advisors, who had Hamas material printed in his own church newspaper and who has preferred both the company and advice of those who would enable the mass murder of Israelis, not to mention had a muslim upbringing during childhood then a debate with you is a complete waste of my time.
For you libtards, this is all that’s kept your pathetic, sorry ass safe and free for 232 years. Not “talk”. Not “quitting”. Not “pleading with the enemy”.
None of you, NOT ONE, can provide an example where “communication with preconception” secured America’s safety or freedoms, or prevented the murder of innocent men, women, and children.
Any MORE evidence was necessary to demonstrate that the MSM is leading interference for Obambi:
Calling reporter ‘sweetie’ gets on YouTube
BY KATHLEEN GRAY
May 15, 2008
FREE PRESS STAFF WRITER
Sweetie: a term of endearment, or an overly familiar and offensive nickname?
When it comes to news media relations for candidates, it’s best to play it safe and avoid the word.
Sen. Barack Obama, who is edging toward the Democratic presidential nomination, offhandedly called a Detroit television reporter “sweetie” during a tour Wednesday of Chrysler’s Sterling Stamping Plant in Sterling Heights after she hurled a question at him: “Senator, what are you going to do to help American autoworkers?” The incident got picked up by the national news media, and the video, which shows Obama saying, “Hold on one second, sweetie, we’ll do a press avail,” to WXYZ-TV (Channel 7) reporter Peggy Agar, is playing on YouTube.com.
Several hours later, Obama left a message on Agar’s cell phone, apologizing.
“It’s a bad habit of mine,” he said in the voice mail, which is on the TV station’s Web site. “I mean no disrespect, so I am duly chastened on that front.”
Agar said in a televised report that she was more upset that Obama didn’t answer her question.
“Hold on a second, sweetie” - Barack HUSSEIN Obama
.
I saw this woman interviewed on her own teevee station last night. She stated that she wasn’t the least bit offended, nor did she think that Obama was being condescending.
Give me a friggin’ break. Had John McCain said that -
I suppose in “Barry’s World”, the term “sweetie” is an acceptable salutation. In the world in which the rest of us live, however, the use of the term “sweetie” is considered pejorative and will bring on a lawsuit. It will be trotted out as evidence of the creation of the infamous hostile and offensive environment, the foundation for a sexual harassment claim.
Any MORE evidence was necessary to demonstrate that the MSM is leading interference for Obambi:
Calling reporter ‘sweetie’ gets on YouTube
BY KATHLEEN GRAY
May 15, 2008
FREE PRESS STAFF WRITER
Sweetie: a term of endearment, or an overly familiar and offensive nickname?
When it comes to news media relations for candidates, it’s best to play it safe and avoid the word.
Sen. Barack Obama, who is edging toward the Democratic presidential nomination, offhandedly called a Detroit television reporter “sweetie” during a tour Wednesday of Chrysler’s Sterling Stamping Plant in Sterling Heights after she hurled a question at him: “Senator, what are you going to do to help American autoworkers?” The incident got picked up by the national news media, and the video, which shows Obama saying, “Hold on one second, sweetie, we’ll do a press avail,” to WXYZ-TV (Channel 7) reporter Peggy Agar, is playing on YouTube.com.
Several hours later, Obama left a message on Agar’s cell phone, apologizing.
“It’s a bad habit of mine,” he said in the voice mail, which is on the TV station’s Web site. “I mean no disrespect, so I am duly chastened on that front.”
Agar said in a televised report that she was more upset that Obama didn’t answer her question.
“Hold on a second, sweetie” - Barack HUSSEIN Obama
.
I saw this woman interviewed on her own teevee station last night. She stated that she wasn’t the least bit offended, nor did she think that Obama was being condescending.
Give me a friggin’ break. Had John McCain said that -
KATY BAR THE DOOR !!
.
Obama should be thankful that Peggy Agar was not “on the rag” when he referred to her as “sweetie”. Perhaps WHAT OBAMA REALLY MEANT was that she smelled like a “sweet” woman as a result of having that “fresh” and “clean” feeling.
I suppose in “Barry’s World”, the term “sweetie” is an acceptable salutation. In the world in which the rest of us live, however, the use of the term “sweetie” is considered pejorative and will bring on a lawsuit. It will be trotted out as evidence of the creation of the infamous hostile and offensive environment, the foundation for a sexual harassment claim.
PROFESSIONAL men do NOT speak that way.
Obama, in his apologetic phone call to the reporterette, claimed that he says that all the time to “all kinds of people” - the female reporter btw, is fat, dumpy, and most unattractive - but, he realizes he probably shouldn’t. Maybe she felt complimented.
Had John McCain said anything similar, the MSM headline:
McCain Addresses Woman Reporter as an Aged Grandfather Would
Wouldn’t it a least be appropriate to use the whole statement from Barack’s website?
Diplomacy: Obama is the only major candidate who supports tough, direct presidential diplomacy with Iran without preconditions. Now is the time to pressure Iran directly to change their troubling behavior. Obama would offer the Iranian regime a choice. If Iran abandons its nuclear program and support for terrorism, we will offer incentives like membership in the World Trade Organization, economic investments, and a move toward normal diplomatic relations. If Iran continues its troubling behavior, we will step up our economic pressure and political isolation. Seeking this kind of comprehensive settlement with Iran is our best way to make progress.
It is not only appropriate but necessary to use the entire quote. This way, we can see the entirety of Obama’s misconceptions.
Obama assumes that Middle Eastern leaders can be enticed with economic incentives. This shows even less understanding of that world than the general public’s.
Middle Easterners almost always use violence to settle their disagreements. They come together only when faced with a bigger threat. Very tribal, always.
Yet, now, with Obama, they will change their centuries-old habits and respond to economic incentives from the US?
Obama should be required to support this fantasy with actual events. Where have economic incentives worked there? I’m particularly interested in settlements with Middle Eastern countries where force, or the threat of, was not a primary factor in negotiations.
Does anyone else see the irony of Obama’s ignorance? Another US president who will have to learn on the job about the Middle East. Obama will make Bush look like a sage.
