Harry: “Oh come on I quoted a respected web site that can be googled in seconds. Long live freedom of information eh.”Does that make it right?
I can make a bomb in minutes with simple things I find in your home. The same with a firearm silencer, etc. does that make it appropriate to post for all to see?
“With freedom of speech comes responsibilities”, eh?
<sigh>
i think your real problem with the post is that it points out the truth. It makes clear how doomed to failure this plan was.
On 18 September, Lieutenant-Colonel (ret.) Nigel Wylde, a former senior British Army Intelligence Officer with decades of anti-terror and explosives experience, declared the plot to be ‘fiction’. He said the explosives in question could not possibly have been produced on the plane. “So who came up with the idea that a bomb could be made on board? Not Al Qaeda for sure. It would not work. Bin Laden is interested in success not deterrence by failure,” Wylde stated. He further suggested that the plot was an invention of the UK security services in order to justify wide-ranging new security measures that threaten to permanently curtail civil liberties and to suspend sections of the United Kingdom’s Human Rights Act of 1998
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_transatlantic_aircraft_plot#cite_note-43

