12 of 12
12

A “Typical White Person”?!
Posted: 23 March 2008 01:58 PM   [ Ignore ]  [ # 166 ]

This post's average rating is:

  • 4 stars out of 5 in 4 vote(s)
 
G. Will
Total Posts:  726
Joined  2007-04-01
sdy - 23 March 2008 11:00 AM

thugz,
My last sentence was an (unsuccessful) attempt at sarcasm.

I do consider “typical white person”, as Obama used the term, to be a racial / ethnic stereotype.

It was ironic and strange that after Obama criticized his grandmother for uttering racial/ethnic stereotypes, he came back with such a phrase himself.

Bingo. I have found that the biggest racists are invariably those who claim that other people are being racist.

For the record, I am fifty-two, and I have lived in the Deep South (Mississippi and Texas) for over thirty years. I have yet to run into the stereotypical white redneck racist. I have encountered racists, most of them non-white - look up MALDEF, La Raza, and their various “fellow travellers” for examples.

 Signature 

“Trouble rather the tiger in his lair than the sage amongst his books. For to you Kingdoms and armies are things mighty and enduring, but to him they are but toys of the moment, to be overturned by the flicking of a finger ...”

Lessons: Anonymous

 
 
Posted: 23 March 2008 03:37 PM   [ Ignore ]  [ # 167 ]

This post's average rating is:

  • 2 stars out of 5 in 4 vote(s)
 
Voter
Total Posts:  6
Joined  2008-03-23

It is astounding to see how unfairly and viciously some radio and TV commentators are reacting to Barack Obama’s speech on race.  It is simply inexcusable to say, as they do, that Obama “threw his own [white] grandmother under the bus.”

Rather, contrary to what everyone expected, he didn’t throw anyone under the bus, neither his regrettably hate-filled pastor, nor his own partially prejudiced grandmother who herself admitted that she sometimes struggled with such feelings (as Obama makes clear in his book, Dreams of My Father).  He didn’t throw racially resentful blue collar workers under the bus, nor did he throw angry unemployed black radicals, nor you or me under the bus.
Instead, he pointed out that we are all part of this wonderful but in some ways still flawed America, and that there are legitimate reasons for some of the hurtful black and white anger that divides us—anger which, nonetheless, we should all strive to overcome.

Never since Lincoln has a politician spoken to our nation with greater candor, dignity, and truthfulness. Obama stands tall above all the carping talk show hosts who—resentful at being confronted by a person so utterly sincere, honest and, quite simply, good—try in vain to pick him to pieces.

His speech will stand the test of time because it represents something new—not politics as usual, but something that lies at the root of all right-minded religion.  I begin to wonder if America is worthy of this person of such uniqueness, stature, integrity, and amazing magnanimity. 

Rev. Jim Boswell

 
 
Posted: 23 March 2008 04:08 PM   [ Ignore ]  [ # 168 ]

This post's average rating is:

  • 4.7 stars out of 5 in 3 vote(s)
 
M. Thatcher
Total Posts:  8376
Joined  2007-03-24
James Boswell - 23 March 2008 03:37 PM


<snip>

His speech will stand the test of time because it represents something new—not politics as usual, but something that lies at the root of all right-minded religion.  I begin to wonder if America is worthy of this person of such uniqueness, stature, integrity, and amazing magnanimity. 

Rev. Jim Boswell

Yo Rev. Jim!

It’s called SPAM when you copy and paste the same post across several threads.

Obamaspam???

Yeah, racism and bigotry are ok so long as it’s a Black thing, huh?

Obamas_Religion_of_Hate.gif

Does that mean George Wallace was correct and justified in expressing his angry white, racist attitudes? It must be so if you say the same for Obama!

georgewallace001.jpg

Wallace_4_Obama.jpg

 Signature 


Haneek rabbak - - Nanat sag suk mizaneh! - - Islam: Religion of Evil!

“To ERR is human, to FORGIVE divine. HOWEVER, neither is Marine Corps Policy.”

:coolgrin:

 
 
Posted: 23 March 2008 08:36 PM   [ Ignore ]  [ # 169 ]

This post's average rating is:

  • 3 stars out of 5 in 2 vote(s)
 
Voter
Total Posts:  2
Joined  2008-03-23

On Obama’s “Typical White Women” And Other Rants

It is amusing to hear Obama’s characterization of “typical white women” as he threw his white grandmother under the bus.

However, it also brings up the point of whether Obama having sat complacently for twenty years in the pews of Rev. Wright’s subversive “Black Liberation Theology Church” soaking in all the vitriol and the venom has not left him out of touch with modern realities, but wallowing in the victimization of the past instead, in the same ancient reactionary black racial hatred, anti-white bigotry, and archaic commie-leftist “Revolutionary” “Black Panther” failed ideology only geriatric senile tin-pot dictators and despots like Castro and Kim Jong-Il still embrace today, and that Rev. Wright, and his fellow aging black Welfare and victimization Pimps from the Civil Rights Movement, amazingly, still continue to pander. Is that representative of Obama’s “New Vision for the Future”? More racial and Marxist rehash from the past?!? Oh, please!

A white woman alarmed at being followed by a black man in today’s America??? You must be kidding. Nowadays she’d probably turn around and chase lustfully after the hapless black guy! Just look at all the inbred white women fainting, swooning, and having ecstatic orgasms at Obama rallies - just at the flash of his toothy grin, or the sound of his voice!

It seems that after centuries of clanish inbreeding, sixty years of Civil Rights, Affirmative Action, “political correctness” run amok, societal indoctrination at every level - from schools, to TV programs (nothing but black sit-coms), commercials (with the inevitable black male and white woman), to movies (black Vikings, black Robin Hoods and other historical absurdities), to Rap music and Hip Hop - and, frankly, not color-blindness, but outright favoritism to blacks and their “Hood” subculture, most white American women have not only lost their “racist” inhibitions to interbreed with blacks, but actually have an evolutionary inbred libido (to expand their gene pools I guess) to pant heavily after anything black and run a “Jungle Fever”… like Obama’s mommy did, to his “racist” grandmother’s chagrin.

As a matter of fact, nowadays some white women even boast they will not pair up if not with a black man - as a white girl fellow highschool student told my horrified daughter once: “that she wouldn’t date white boys, only black boys” (of course it was all the fad); or you hear them (as I have at work) whispering to each other “black is the best they’ve had” (apparently they were not getting much at all), to the point you feel you are listening to a Eugene O’Neill play gone wild…of course, it is also convenient to have the supply of drugs at home, and that one’s man is not overly concerned about our slothfulness, or overly jealous about our habitual infidelities.

On the other hand, it is pitiful to see many young black men paired up with trashy white women, while disdaining much better looking, far worthier, black women, just so they can parade their “White Biaches” as if it was the latest pair of Nikes in vogue.

But then it is not only inbred white women alone who seem to be sexually aroused by Obama’s “blackness.” The liberal media has been so overwhelmingly obsequious in its abject, sniveling, groveling coverage of Obama, that it prompted none other than the “ultra-conservative” (yeah, right) producers and participants of Saturday Night Live to make all the Obama-mania the butt of their jokes for weeks now. On this very thread, the Rev. Jim Boswell states, quote: “I begin to wonder if America is worthy of this person of such uniqueness [...hmmm], stature [...Ahhh], integrity [...huh], and amazing magnanimity [...yes...yes Obama, yes!].” Seems the good Reverend had an orgasmic experience as he adulated and fawned all over Obama at the end of his sentence. But then, that’s nothing new. The other day on MSNBC’s Hardball with Chris Matthews, in an all out apologia for Obama’s “superb”, “brilliant”, “breathtaking” speech (to quote just some of the superlatives used by those in the media to describe it), none other than noted HBO commie-comic Bill Maher, was so ecstatic about the “sublimity” of the Obama speech, even alluding to it as one of the world’s greatest literary masterpieces (move over Quijote, Obama “El Negro” is here), that he swooned and literally had an Obama orgasm on camera, as he lauded the speech. I wonder if being white - in spite of himself - Maher was not perhaps suffering from the same inbred libido for black males of his white female counterparts...albeit a latent homosexual one. At any rate, just as with Rev. Boswell by the time he finished eulogizing and adulating Obama and his speech Maher was visibly on the thralls of the greatest ecstatic orgasm of his life. Pathetic!

And of course, the left is ecstatic about all this interracial breeding as much as it is about one of the resulting half-breeds of such pairings, Obama, having a shot at the presidency, after all, one of their goals, as they have always clearly stated, is the “Browning of America” - whether by interracial breeding or bringing them by the millions from south of the border - to swell their “constituencies.” The one sure way to outbreed white people into extinction.

After all, God only knows America needs all the resented half-breed, leftist, “Hugo Chávezes” within its borders that it can muster! Right, Rev. Wright?

 
 
Posted: 23 March 2008 10:10 PM   [ Ignore ]  [ # 170 ]

This post's average rating is:

  • 2.3 stars out of 5 in 3 vote(s)
 
Voter
Total Posts:  6
Joined  2008-03-23

This last reminds me of some of the charges of wanting to “inbreed” that were thrown at Lincoln simply because he didn’t think blacks should be enslaved.

You guys are going to have a difficult time of it, I think, as you see more and more people beginning genuinely to admire and respect this man for his outstanding qualities.  For now, this much can be said with near certainty:  Obama’s speech on race will probably be, historically, one of the most important speeches ever given by an American presidential candidate, perhaps the most important since Lincoln’s Cooper Union Address.

Sorry that sort of thing gets you so upset, but you’ve had your beloved Bush for quite a while now, and look where that got us.  Time for a change. —Rev. Jim Boswell

 
 
Posted: 23 March 2008 11:29 PM   [ Ignore ]  [ # 171 ]

This post's average rating is:

  • 5 stars out of 5 in 2 vote(s)
 
Voter
Total Posts:  2
Joined  2008-03-23

Quote: “For now, this much can be said with near certainty:  Obama’s speech on race will probably be, historically, one of the most important speeches ever given by an American presidential candidate, perhaps the most important since Lincoln’s Cooper Union Address.”

Rev. Jim Boswell

“...one of the most important speeches [Oh God, here comes the swooning] ever given by an American presidential candidate...”???

Give me a brake! Get a hold of yourself, Rev. Boswell! here you go having another ecstatic Obama orgasm again!

To quote the very erudite Charles Krauthammer in his column of March 21, 2008 on Real Clear Politics, entitled, appropriately enough, “The Speech: A Brilliant Fraud” :

“This contextual analysis of Wright’s venom [comparing it to his own grandmother’s innate racism], this extenuation of black hate speech as a product of white racism, is not new. It’s the Jesse Jackson politics of racial grievance, expressed in Ivy League diction and Harvard Law nuance. That’s why the speech made so many liberal commentators swoon: It bathed them in racial guilt, while flattering their intellectual pretensions. An unbeatable combination.”

“But Obama was supposed to be new. He flatters himself as a man of the future transcending the anger of the past as represented by his beloved pastor. Obama then waxes rhapsodic about the hope brought by the new consciousness of the young people in his campaign.”

“Then answer this, senator: If Wright is a man of the past, why would you expose your children to his vitriolic divisiveness? This is a man who curses America and who proclaimed moral satisfaction in the deaths of 3,000 innocents at a time when their bodies were still being sought at Ground Zero. It is not just the older congregants who stand and cheer and roar in wild approval of Wright’s rants, but young people as well. Why did you give $22,500 just two years ago to a church run by a man of the past who infects the younger generation with precisely the racial attitudes and animus you say you have come unto us to transcend?”

Mr. Krauthammer is absolutely right, Rev. Boswell, in spite of how many multiple orgasms you may keep having every time you hear Obama utter but a single a word.

Perhaps you should go on Oprah (after all, isn’t she another black luminary?) since I heard she recently did a program on “multiple orgasms”. I’m sure you’ll fit in… all they have to do is just play you a clip of Obama.

 
 
Posted: 24 March 2008 03:25 AM   [ Ignore ]  [ # 172 ]

This post's average rating is:

  • 5 stars out of 5 in 1 vote(s)
 
Voter
Total Posts:  1
Joined  2008-03-24
IronDioPriest - 20 March 2008 04:27 PM

I guess it is now OK to say that Barack Obama is just another typical Black person.

Thanks for the clarification Barack. It’s hard for us typical White people to know what’s OK to say and what’s not.

I think he needs to be more specific and clarify for us how he describes a “typical white person” as opposed to a “non-typical white person”.  Certainly he would not be so bold as to assume that every white person is “typical”?  And then, just so it would help me to understand better, I would like him to describe if there is such a thing as a “typical black person” and a “non-typical black person”.  Lets just focus on black and white for now.  It could get time consuming to listen to his belief’s about every other color of person out there.

 
 
Posted: 24 March 2008 03:31 AM   [ Ignore ]  [ # 173 ]

This post's average rating is:

  • 5 stars out of 5 in 2 vote(s)
 
W. F. Buckley
Total Posts:  4516
Joined  2006-11-20
James Boswell - 23 March 2008 10:10 PM

You guys are going to have a difficult time of it, I think, as you see more and more people beginning genuinely to admire and respect this man for his outstanding qualities.

Sorry.
A lot of Americans that were fooled into thinking Obama had outstanding qualities were quickly disabused of that idea by his “racist” speech and the ravings of his “uncle-like” minister!

For now, this much can be said with near certainty:  Obama’s speech on race will probably be, historically, one of the most important speeches ever given by an American presidential candidate, perhaps the most important since Lincoln’s Cooper Union Address.

Bwahahahahahaha!
As if...!
Obama’s speech was about as important as one of Emily Lutella’s rants; he blamed Whitey for everything, then proposed himself as President and more big government programs as the answer.
I don’t think so!

Sorry that sort of thing gets you so upset, but you’ve had your beloved Bush for quite a while now, and look where that got us.

I do love President Bush and I like where it got us!

Time for a change.

I don’t want Obama’s kind of change.
If I wanted Marxism, I’d go live in Cuba.

 
 
12 of 12
12

You need to be logged in to reply. Please Login or Register