I just want to apologize for starting this whole crap storm. I should have used a different term when describing Shmuels Friend. I actually felt remorse for using such a derogatory and juvenile term. I decided to revisit that thread this morning and offer an apology to Shmuels Friend. Little did I know that his response would prove my initially selected terminology correct.
You’re jewish (evidently) and so you naturally favor jews over non-jews. You’re not capable of anything else and indeed are driven by this directive.
Any other questions?
And you, Odette, become the only person to voice such a disgusting accusation. Shame on you sir. Shame on you.
Indio:
In defense of Odette. I’ve had many discussions with her and honestly never had a sense she was in any way antagonistic toward Jews. Not very bright, but not antagonistic toward Jews either. There is one thing about her though: she is a bit of shiker and after a few she really doesn’t know what she’s saying. So let’s judge favorably.
BTW, Indio, you must know that charming old Yiddish ditty: Oy, shiker iz a goy, shiker iz a goy, shiker iz er, trinken muz er, vayl er iz a goy (“Oy, drunken is a goy, drunken is a goy, a goy is drunk, he has to drink because he is a goyâ€), and Oy, nikhter iz a yid, nikhter iz a yid, nikhter iz er, davnen muz er, vayl er iz a yid (“Oy, sober is a Jew, sober is a Jew, a Jew is sober, he has to pray because he is a Jewâ€).
Great tune. Pity it never made it to the Welk show.
This is Shmuels Friend reporting from track side. It’s been nip and tuck all day, a real seesaw battle. As we approach the home stretch “no” is in the lead by a big hooked nose but “yes” is right behind moving at a nice easy pace and looks like he’s get plenty left for a late charge. At this stage the race is still a toss up, but I’m putting my money on “yes.” All the Jews have probably already voted for Shmuels Friends and gone home, but the bars are still packed and when they let out the “yes” people will stumble home to their computers and push “yes” across the line first. Anyway, that’s the way it looks to this punter.
From track side, this has been Shmuels Friend. Now over to Racketman for news of tonight’s crossburning.
SF could simply be a leftist troll (dailykoskid type plant) on a mission to stir up the kind of antisemitism we’ve come to loath and expect from the left, which is so apparent on liberal blogs.
We’ve seen where both the left and jihadists use similar tactics to express a common “love” for America.
What kind of plant might he/she/it be, I haven’t yet determined. Fruit or vegetable?
I’d just caution folks to take everything with a grain of salt.
SF could simply be a leftist troll (dailykoskid type plant) on a mission to stir up the kind of antisemitism we’ve come to loath and expect from the left, which is so apparent on liberal blogs.
We’ve seen where both the left and jihadists use similar tactics to express a common “love” for America.
What kind of plant might he/she/it be, I haven’t yet determined. Fruit or vegetable?
I’d just caution folks to take everything with a grain of salt.
That right, I am a “leftist troll.” I live under a bridge in Berkeley. Drop by and see me some time, big boy.
I just want to apologize for starting this whole crap storm. I should have used a different term when describing Shmuels Friend. I actually felt remorse for using such a derogatory and juvenile term.
Aww.
Damn. If you had just left your finger in there, you couldn’t have undone “iggy” and everything would have worked out for me. But just to show you there’s no hard feelings, I accept your gracious apology before you took it back. And say hi to mom.
SF could simply be a leftist troll (dailykoskid type plant) on a mission to stir up the kind of antisemitism we’ve come to loath and expect from the left, which is so apparent on liberal blogs.
We’ve seen where both the left and jihadists use similar tactics to express a common “love” for America.
What kind of plant might he/she/it be, I haven’t yet determined. Fruit or vegetable?
I’d just caution folks to take everything with a grain of salt.
I have become a liberal and am quite pleased with the defination of a liberal.
You have any idea what liberal means?
From your posts I would say that you do not.
If the pot calls the kettle black, and the kettle calls the pot black, ought the both be treated the same? I think so.
SF could simply be a leftist troll (dailykoskid type plant) on a mission to stir up the kind of antisemitism we’ve come to loath and expect from the left, which is so apparent on liberal blogs.
We’ve seen where both the left and jihadists use similar tactics to express a common “love” for America.
What kind of plant might he/she/it be, I haven’t yet determined. Fruit or vegetable?
I’d just caution folks to take everything with a grain of salt.
I have become a liberal and am quite pleased with the defination of a liberal.
You have any idea what liberal means?
From your posts I would say that you do not.
If the pot calls the kettle black, and the kettle calls the pot black, ought the both be treated the same? I think so.
So, you want to be treated like a black liberal? Is that it?
SF could simply be a leftist troll (dailykoskid type plant) on a mission to stir up the kind of antisemitism we’ve come to loath and expect from the left, which is so apparent on liberal blogs.
We’ve seen where both the left and jihadists use similar tactics to express a common “love” for America.
What kind of plant might he/she/it be, I haven’t yet determined. Fruit or vegetable?
I’d just caution folks to take everything with a grain of salt.
I have become a liberal and am quite pleased with the defination of a liberal.
You have any idea what liberal means?
From your posts I would say that you do not.
If the pot calls the kettle black, and the kettle calls the pot black, ought the both be treated the same? I think so.
Thank you, oldjim. I agree with you 100%.
Which reminds me of that famous story when Casey Stengel testified before Congress while Mickey Mantle sat next to him waiting for his turn. The great Casey double-talked for 15 minutes. When he was finished one of the Congressman asked Mantle how he felt about Casey’s statement. Mantle replied, “I agree with everything Casey said.”