Power Line News

RFA - 09 July 2007 09:55 PM

DonJon - 09 July 2007 07:13 PM

The reasonable man, when threatened, will “err on the side of caution.” Is it not reasonable to do the same when, on our watch, the assets of our Posterity may be at risk?  I am

sincerely,

DonJon.

And Sincerely a fool.

When threatened, I intend to defend myself.

As for the Oak Tree in a suit...Yes Al, today is the first day of the rest of your life. How friggin profound. I’ve met coffe cups with more depth.

RFA:

To ‘err on the side of caution’ may well include defending yourself.  And in the case of climate change it would most certainly include defending yourself.  The former Vice President may be sounding the alarmist bell, but there is no definitive proof that human activity is not contribution to climate change.  This fact compels us to start ‘defending’ ourselves and our Posterity by finding solutions to secure the American Trust. 

I trust you will start defending yourself, your Posterity and that of your fellow citizens.  Thank you for your post.  I am

sincerely,

DonJon.

http://www.molochtheplutocracy.us

Yogi Bera has been replaced.

DonJon - 09 July 2007 10:48 PM

I am

sincerely,

DonJon.

You are
sincerely,
a loon.
(You and Algore should get together! You’ll have lots to talk about.)

“We are in a transition time in history when the only way we can get to where we need to be is by starting from where we are.” AlGore, LiveEarth Jun ‘07.

Oh, I get it. Al Gore is paraphrasing a line from The Adventures of Buckaroo Banzai Across the 8th Dimension ;

“Hey, hey, hey. Don’t be mean. We don’t have to be mean because, remember, no matter where you go, there you are. “. 

I guess you have to be stoned.

Whatever. When Newt Gingrich and Dick Cheney are modelling Calvin Klein underwear, I’ll pay attention to your “ridicule.”

When Newt and Dick are on the cover of Rolling Stone popping a collective woody, I’ll let you ridicule.  I guess the women that kept raising Bill Clinton’s approval ratings when behavior went from BJ’s to exposure, to rape, like that sort of thing.

Rush calls Al Gore “Boron.”

DonJon - 09 July 2007 10:48 PM

RFA - 09 July 2007 09:55 PM

DonJon - 09 July 2007 07:13 PM

The reasonable man, when threatened, will “err on the side of caution.” Is it not reasonable to do the same when, on our watch, the assets of our Posterity may be at risk?  I am

sincerely,

DonJon.

And Sincerely a fool.

When threatened, I intend to defend myself.

As for the Oak Tree in a suit...Yes Al, today is the first day of the rest of your life. How friggin profound. I’ve met coffe cups with more depth.

RFA:

To ‘err on the side of caution’ may well include defending yourself.  And in the case of climate change it would most certainly include defending yourself.  The former Vice President may be sounding the alarmist bell, but there is no definitive proof that human activity is not contribution to climate change.  This fact compels us to start ‘defending’ ourselves and our Posterity by finding solutions to secure the American Trust. 

I trust you will start defending yourself, your Posterity and that of your fellow citizens.  Thank you for your post.  I am

sincerely,

DonJon.

http://www.molochtheplutocracy.us

Re: “The former Vice President may be sounding the alarmist bell, but there is no definitive proof that human activity is not contribution to climate change.”

Do you have any definitive proof that people dancing around a fire does not contribute to climate change?

vladimir estragon - 09 July 2007 01:03 PM

Al must be running in ‘08--he’s getting fat again.

Additional evidence that the American right is running on empty: Al Gore’s waistline is a topic of concern.

Awwwwwww C’mon ...

The guy just BEGS to be ridiculed.

It’s only polite to accomodate him.

:-)

Al Gore is now a star
But says were doomed by the car
At an intersection
But without direction
He says: start from where you are

Old Grouch - 10 July 2007 11:14 AM

Re: “The former Vice President may be sounding the alarmist bell, but there is no definitive proof that human activity is not contribution to climate change.”

Do you have any definitive proof that people dancing around a fire does not contribute to climate change?

Old Grouch:

Your false analogy aside, our responsibility to Posterity, as asserted in the Constitution of the United States of America puts the burden of proof on the side of risk.  If in fact there is the possibility of risk, as there is with climate change, then it is our Constitutional Duty to assume it to be real until proven otherwise.  The true analogy being the reasonable man will wear a seat belt when driving, although there is no proof of an impending accident.  If this reasonable man is carrying his children, or Posterity, he will see it as his ‘duty’ to assure that risk is averted.  Thank you for your post.  I am

sincerely,

DonJon.

http://www.molochtheplutocracy.us

JentheNeoCon - 10 July 2007 01:16 AM

DonJon - 09 July 2007 10:48 PM

I am

sincerely,

DonJon.

You are
sincerely,
a loon.
(You and Algore should get together! You’ll have lots to talk about.)

JentheNeoCon:

Your argumentum ad hominem provides nothing to this debate.  I trust you have a greater capacity to communicate than this.  Possibly you can enlighten us to the reasons you feel our founding fathers put the words ‘and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity’ in our Constitution if not to secure the American Trust for future generations.  Thank you for your post.  I am

sincerely,

DonJon.

http://www.molochtheplutocracy.us

Nothing about what impositions will be visited upon the American people in terms of economic deprivation and confiscation of private assets through onerous taxation all in the name of fending off the impossibly possible can be even remotely related to securing ‘the Blessings of Liberty’.

Despite the fact that there’s been no “consensus” on what constitutes the most beneficial global temperature, some have decided that today’s is it, although there’s no scientific reason to believe it is OR THAT A DAMN THING CAN BE DONE TO CHANGE THAT. 

YOU FOOL.

I am

Not Buying It,

Pandora

Pandora - 11 July 2007 03:41 AM

Nothing about what impositions will be visited upon the American people in terms of economic deprivation and confiscation of private assets through onerous taxation all in the name of fending off the impossibly possible can be even remotely related to securing ‘the Blessings of Liberty’.

Despite the fact that there’s been no “consensus” on what constitutes the most beneficial global temperature, some have decided that today’s is it, although there’s no scientific reason to believe it is OR THAT A DAMN THING CAN BE DONE TO CHANGE THAT. 

YOU FOOL.

I am

Not Buying It,

Pandora

Pandora:

Fortunately, there is no reason that there should be any ‘economic deprivation’ or ‘confiscation of private assets through onerous taxation’ to solve this problem.  American Ingenuity built this Great Nation into the economic power that it is today.  We will only retain this power if we reinvent ourselves and once again sell it to the world.  Maintaining our economic leadership in the 21st Century will require a renewal of our industrial base with new products, services and expertise to export. 

As the Worlds Consumer, America is in the unique position to define the next economic revolution.  By exporting the Industrial Revolution worldwide America became the dominate economic power.  But the Industrial Revolution has run its course and we can no longer compete due to the high standard of living it created for us.  The Sustainable Technologies Industry is one of the few promising new sectors with global potential that America can utilize its economic power to create and dominate.  By leading this new Sustainable Revolution, we will once again, begin exporting that Great American Ingenuity.

In every challenge lay opportunity, by accepting the challenge of climate change we will provide for our Constitutional Duty to our Posterity by both protecting the natural resources and securing the economic future of this Great Nation. 

That is the damn thing we can do about it.  Thank you for your post, I am

sincerely & respectfully,

DonJon.

http://www.molochtheplutocracy.us

DonJon:

Please explain where you got “But the Industrial Revolution has run its course and we can no longer compete due to the high standard of living it created for us”.