1 of 8
1

McCain’s CPAC speech
Posted: 07 February 2008 11:26 PM

This post's average rating is:

  • 2.4 stars out of 5 in 5 vote(s)
  [ Ignore ]  
Administrator
Total Posts:  1873
Joined  2006-10-15

John McCain reached out to conservatives today in a well-received <a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/02/john_mccains_cpac_spee

» View the article

 
 
Posted: 07 February 2008 11:27 PM   [ Ignore ]  [ # 1 ]

This post's average rating is:

  • 4.5 stars out of 5 in 8 vote(s)
 
K. Rove
Total Posts:  346
Joined  2006-11-10

The fatal flaw in McCain’s CPAC speech is that he failed to ~apologize.~

He admitted to significant differences with the base. <gulp> Okay.

He now seems to believe that people on both sides of an issue—amnesty, for example—may be people of integrity and good will.  Fair enough.

So what is his excuse for trying to “cram down” his immigration legislation?  What is his excuse for trying to roll his conservative opponents with a nasty legislative powerplay—closed meetings; no debate; no time to even read the bill?  WHAT IS HIS EXCUSE FOR THIS?

And did McCain say, at the time, that the opponents of his legislation were honorable people with a different opinion?  Or did he and his sidekick Lindsey Graham demonize his conservative critics as “loud ones,” “bigots,” etc?

It is hard to choke down the ideological differences between McCain and the conservative base.  But, it is true that honorable people can come to different conclusions at times.

Sadly, there was nothing honorable in the way McCain behaved in the amnesty struggle.  He was wrong on the issue, Stalinist in his legislative style, and slimeball in his assaults on those who disagreed with him. 

For at least two out of three of these transgressions, he owes the base an apology.  Not a reflective discourse on how honorable people can sometimes differ.  He owes an actual ~apology~ for his strong-arm tactics and for his nasty smears of his opponents.

His speech at CPAC did not come near settling these matters.

 
 
Posted: 07 February 2008 11:43 PM   [ Ignore ]  [ # 2 ]

This post's average rating is:

  • 4.7 stars out of 5 in 6 vote(s)
 
B. Goldwater
Total Posts:  2374
Joined  2006-11-04

His speech at CPAC did not come near settling these matters.

Remember, that’s the most conservative and consolatory speech you’ll hear from him all year. It’s general election time and he’ll have to move left.

 Signature 

Hillary Clinton may have popularized the saying “It takes a village to raise a child,” but Barack Obama actually comes from one.
Unknown

 
 
Posted: 07 February 2008 11:47 PM   [ Ignore ]  [ # 3 ]

This post's average rating is:

  • 4.3 stars out of 5 in 6 vote(s)
 
D. Eisenhower
Total Posts:  604
Joined  2007-09-07

Dear Powerline Authors…

Sorry, I feel you must be kidding.

This was the same stump speech John McCain has made repeatedly on the campaign trail.

Even before he ran to the left, peddling Global Warming populism in NH.

The same McCain supporters cheered him on today, with the Beltway Elites and SENATE ASSOCIATES, trying to provide the ‘image’ of embrace at CPAC.

I realize now, I am going to watch the wholesale decline of credibility from so many, trying to sell John McCain.

Some want to believe in something so desperately, they will fabricate the best.

John McCain lied repeatedly in the Campaign, telling Republicans his vote against TAX CUTS were about spending.

It was CLINTONIAN in it’s spin.

So was the ugly SMEARING OF MR. Romney in Florida and at the Reagan Library.

John McCain is unethical…

It is regretful, but that is reality.

Today, just like the Clintons before their base, after running to center to win an election, Senator McCain plays the game to recoup some support.

The key words ?

“INTEND TO”
They mean nothing…

This is a Senator of 24 years, who has no accomplishment (but a Campaign Finance Bill that limits Free Speech), who is pushing a GASOLINE taxation as a global warming solution !

Oh my…

And some are going to pretend, after one speech, what a wonderful Candidate John McCain is?

His age, deceit, anger, lack of any CEO experience, etc…

John McCain won’t even pour water over the face of a terrorist, when thousands of lives are risk.

It is the same old swindle…

Ignoring the ugly, to maintain a victory over the opposition.

I cannot support that…

One will lose all credibility - sanity in the end.

Our side will recover, but not with John McCain’s deceit and liberal placation.

John McCain is not the future.

The fools who empowered the old Keating 5 Member, those who voted just to ‘win’, the others who have a bias against Mormons, probably have just cost themselves, the GOP, and this Nation dearly.

Republicans will continue to sink because of the tired, bitter, McCain.

He will appear so poorly in the face of a classy, youthful, articulate Mr. Obama.

So many liberals voted to save John McCain in NH, and for good reason.

They know he is easy pickings in the General.

It is no wonder why Liberals are thrilled with the defeat of Mr. Romney.

Perhaps sound reason can make a stand in the Congress, limiting the power of whoever the liberal Senator wins in the end.

Maybe the ethical Republicans remaining in Congress can limit the damage.

John McCain is part of the problem, and supporting him only will make matters worse.

 
 
Posted: 08 February 2008 01:01 AM   [ Ignore ]  [ # 4 ]

This post's average rating is:

  • 1 stars out of 5 in 1 vote(s)
 
G. Will
Total Posts:  765
Joined  2006-11-15

After the first 2/3 of his speech I was ready to work for his campaign, but then he got to his AIPAC pander:

They won’t recognize and seriously address the threat posed by an Iran with nuclear ambitions to our ally, Israel, and the region.

I intend to make unmistakably clear to Iran we will not permit a government that espouses the destruction of the State of Israel as its fondest wish and pledges undying enmity to the United States to possess the weapons to advance their malevolent ambitions.

No way will I vote for someone who’s taking the US to war for Israel.  And again.
 
 
Posted: 08 February 2008 01:07 AM   [ Ignore ]  [ # 5 ]

This post's average rating is:

  • 4.5 stars out of 5 in 4 vote(s)
 
Leader
Total Posts:  192
Joined  2006-11-12

Good speech.  Did he mean it?  Will he remember what he said?  Guess it doesn’t matter at this point.  He could have taken the podium, looked at the audience and told them all to go to hell.  Nothing they could do about it.  It wouldn’t have mattered, he’s going to be the nominee whether we like it or not. 

Notice that he never said anything about McCain Feingold Campaign Finance.  Nothing about how it should be re-written to make it a full disclosure law instead of a speech prohibition law.

He said he will uphold the 2nd Amendment.  That would be nice.  An optimist would say that if there is even a 1% chance that he means it that’s a lot more than we would get from Hillary or Obama.  But isn’t it appalling that such doubts exist about someone who claims to be a conservative?  If he still has no respect for the first amendment, does he really care about the 2nd?  Will he look in the mirror tomorrow morning and say to himself, “Screw ‘em.  I have it in my pocket now.  I don’t need those bastards anymore!”?

Moot questions.  It is what it is now.  McCain is no doubt thinking, “Deal with it.”

 
 
Posted: 08 February 2008 01:09 AM   [ Ignore ]  [ # 6 ]

This post's average rating is:

  • 4 stars out of 5 in 3 vote(s)
 
Voter
Total Posts:  12
Joined  2006-11-07

Everything HILLARYNEEDSAVACATION said just now is true. 

That said, I’m going to take my cue from my preferred candidate, Mitt Romney.  If anyone has reason to be angry with John McCain, it’s him.  But Governor Romney is right that we cannot afford to lose this election.  Once the Republican Primary is settled, we need to get behind our candidate and get him elected as the next President of the United States.  It now appears, much to my chagrin, that Senator McCain will be that candidate. 

This doesn’t mean that we should give up all hope.  Yes, John McCain strikes me as deceitful; that means that if he gets elected, we’ll need to be especially vigilant.  Don’t forget that the whole reason why he gave this speech was that he needs our support.  That means that he’ll owe us; and as long as we can keep that fresh in his mind, we can avoid the worst of his excesses. 

The next four years are going to be bad; I have no illusions about that.  The question now is “how bad”?  From what I have seen, John McCain is everything you say he is - and the scariest thing is that he’s still far better than either of his alternatives on the Democrat side.  I’ll be damned if I’m party to a Clinton or Obama Presidency because I didn’t support the best hope left of defeating them.

 
 
Posted: 08 February 2008 01:17 AM   [ Ignore ]  [ # 7 ]

This post's average rating is:

  • 4.3 stars out of 5 in 4 vote(s)
 
Leader
Total Posts:  192
Joined  2006-11-12
Patrick n ABQ - 08 February 2008 01:01 AM

No way will I vote for someone who’s taking the US to war for Israel.

I will. In fact, as much as I can’t fathom voting for McCain, his pledge to protect Israel is likely to make me vote for him.  Protecting Israel protects us, you fool.

 
 
Posted: 08 February 2008 01:20 AM   [ Ignore ]  [ # 8 ]

This post's average rating is:

  • 4.5 stars out of 5 in 2 vote(s)
 
Volunteer
Total Posts:  54
Joined  2007-03-23

Don’t forget that the next president is likely to have 1, maybe 2 Supreme Court Appointments. Do you want Hillary or Obama making them?

 
 
Posted: 08 February 2008 01:20 AM   [ Ignore ]  [ # 9 ]

This post's average rating is:

  • 3.7 stars out of 5 in 3 vote(s)
 
K. Rove
Total Posts:  346
Joined  2006-11-10
Patrick n ABQ - 08 February 2008 01:01 AM

After the first 2/3 of his speech I was ready to work for his campaign, but then he got to his AIPAC pander:

Among his many shortcomings, McCain is—strangely—not ready for prime time.

The difference in the presidential stage and the senate stage is the difference between Broadway and dinner theater in Dubuque.

McCain has gotten away with even more than is usual for a senator, because he has been the pet of the media.  They love a guy who shoots his mouth off...especially when he gets after conservatives.

But that comment about a hundred year in Iraq.  ROFL Well, sure, Mac, we all know you didn’t exactly say that American boys would be dying in Iraq for a hundred years.  But because you are loose cannon who shoots his mouth off, you came close enough!  The Dems are going to stick that comment down your throat until you choke on it.  The surge has caused a bubble of popularity for the war.  But the big picture is that most Americans are sick of Iraq and angry that we are there.

When them Dems cream you with that hundred years comment and you squeal like a stuck pig that you have been taken out of context, well, I am going to remember what you did to Governor Romney over the “secret timetables” quote.  What goes around comes around Johnny Boy!  And the professional GOP pols with their polls of you devouring Hillary or Obama...what a bunch of clowns.

 
 
Posted: 08 February 2008 01:23 AM   [ Ignore ]  [ # 10 ]

This post's average rating is:

  • 5 stars out of 5 in 3 vote(s)
 
Leader
Total Posts:  171
Joined  2006-11-11

I cannot trust McCain.

See: http://www.villagevoice.com/news/0408,schanberg,51276,1.html

And:http://www.villagevoice.com/news/0408,schanberg2,51267,1.html

Among the many forgotten or poorly reported sins of his past . . . his collusion in the early 90’s with John Kerry in whitewashing the fate - or perhaps sealing the fate - of the American POWs never accounted for by the Vietnamese communists.

Kerry was chairman of that Senate sub-committee charged with investigating the many claims and suspicions that the North Vietnamese had never fully accounted for POWs and MIAs they had in their custody at the end of the American participation in the war in 1973. Any credible evidence or witnesses of left-behind POWs was quashed by that committee. There was a document shredding scandal in the aftermath which itself was also quashed. The final report and conclusion was a total whitewash in favor of the Vietnamese communist government - not one credible report of any unaccounted for POW ever held by them - and led to normalization of relations with the Hanoi regime.

It also led to a $905 million contract for the developmemt of the port at Vung Tau by Colliers International, a Boston-based real estate development firm then headed by John Forbes Kerry’s first cousin, Stewart Forbes.

I was never able to swallow these shenanigans, considering the enormously scandalous consequences and hideous humanitarian implications for perhaps 700 POWs and their families, not to mention the awful dishonor to our country. The 700 number was attested to by a high-ranking Vietnamese military officer in a speech he delivered some years after the war and transcribed in Russian in a declassified Soviet-era document. In his typical fashiion, McCain is ruthlessly defensive about the integrity of his efforts and the duplicity and character of those who question those efforts. And considering his own history as a POW, it is all simply mind-boggling in its implications about his character.

 
 
Posted: 08 February 2008 01:29 AM   [ Ignore ]  [ # 11 ]

This post's average rating is:

  • 2.3 stars out of 5 in 3 vote(s)
 
Voter
Total Posts:  3
Joined  2007-07-18

Powerline has supported McCain from day one. As for me, I’ll be voting for Romney in 2012.

 
 
Posted: 08 February 2008 02:08 AM   [ Ignore ]  [ # 12 ]  
Voter
Total Posts:  12
Joined  2006-11-07

So will I.  But what will be your vote in 2008?

 
 
Posted: 08 February 2008 02:43 AM   [ Ignore ]  [ # 13 ]

This post's average rating is:

  • 4.6 stars out of 5 in 5 vote(s)
 
Leader
Total Posts:  163
Joined  2007-08-05

If McCain was a conservative he wouldn’t have to reach out to us, we would be carrying him on our shoulders.

 
 
Posted: 08 February 2008 05:35 AM   [ Ignore ]  [ # 14 ]

This post's average rating is:

  • 4.3 stars out of 5 in 3 vote(s)
 
G. W. Bush
Total Posts:  449
Joined  2007-05-02
postBot - 07 February 2008 11:26 PM

John McCain reached out to conservatives today in a well-received <a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/02/john_mccains_cpac_spee

» View the article

Talk is cheap.

Actions speak louder than words.

Trust, but verify.

Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice…

 
 
Posted: 08 February 2008 06:19 AM   [ Ignore ]  [ # 15 ]

This post's average rating is:

  • 5 stars out of 5 in 2 vote(s)
 
Strategist
Total Posts:  123
Joined  2006-11-08

Don’t be banging your spoon on your bowl demanding your chocolate ice cream just because Juan McCain came to CPAC and broke a little wind in your face. The odor of Campaign Finance Reform, tax cut treachery, Supreme Court treachery and amnesty should have given the true substance away.

But Romney did what he had to do. Let’s not be wasting valuable time and money on a Bob “Viagra” Dole candidate for the Presidency. Someone pointed out (I didn’t verify) that Hillary and Husein Obama each received more votes than McCain, Romney and Huckabee combined. If true this has an ominous feeling to it. Of course many of Hilary’s supporters would flip to McCain if Obama wins and believe me that McCain will do what he has to to win Hilary supporters and he’ll damn conservatives in the process.

Better to focus on a veto-able Senate and a veto-able House followed by majorities. A conservative Presidency is going to require that Americans be taught the meaning of freedom.

 Signature 

Swift-boating : Telling an inconvenient but essential truth about a prominent person’s past

The objective of the left is control, their tool is impoverishment

 
 
1 of 8
1

You need to be logged in to reply. Please Login or Register