postBot - 20 December 2006 06:11 PM
The Inspector General of the National Archives has just released a report on
» View the article
From post…
It is intensely interesting to speculate on what have been in those documents that would lead a former National Security Adviser to hide them in his pants, secrete them under a construction trailer, and finally spirit them to his office, apparently so he could destroy them. This is, I suppose, a clue:
Berger, with the authorization of former President Clinton, was reviewing National Security Council documents on Osama bin Laden and al-Qaida, Sudan, and related presidential correspondence.
This news report does not explain why the IG’s report has just now been made public. We’ll have to see if we can track down a complete copy of the report.
This is one of the most disturbing acts I have ever seen by someone in government. How did he only get community service for this tells you about the privilege of being politically connected in the Left…
This kind of action should be unthinkable. Where is the Left crying out about leaders destroying history?
Because they never cared about dirty deeds and do not now…
They only care about politics and appearances… the appearance of standing for the right, the good, the true.
We are often fooled into believing that what the Left claims to stand for is what we do not stand for… through great postures of their own. However, ultimately, fooled or not, we follow these things and know how they pretend to be good, but are bad… even while they will debate the existance or permanence of “morality”.
This sends a very disturbing message to politicians… that you can do dirty deeds and get away with it, because even if you are caught doing something as severe as removing their presence from the highly restricted national archives… they won’t do anything to you.
I doubt he knew this going in, however. He was likely considering that he was risking real prison time to do this. So what were these documents that this suited genteel man would risk real prison time and his life’s work and reputation to do?
It has to be the worst, which does not surprise me.
We all know how the Left is ultimately for terrorism against the United States, the very country which represents all of the ideals they have pretensions of standing for but really hate.
Because, like Hitler and Stalin, their actions speak louder then words.
Just as they declared Rwanda “not a genocide” and refused to send in troops and even hampered the UN from intervening… so have they done with almost every despicable world happening ever to take place… from protesting aiding Britain in WWII, to supporting Stalin and Soviet Union, to siding with North Korea and the Viet Cong, to siding with the Taliban, Saddam and the Baathists, Pol Pot… and almost any other evil group that has ever existed and we have fought against.
Maybe these statements are not popular… but this is a perspective here, I think, people should think long and hard on.