Soft Power, Part Four
Posted: 26 February 2008 01:15 PM   [ Ignore ]  
Administrator
Total Posts:  1873
Joined  2006-10-15

I have tried today to establish a kind of hierarchy of evidence for discerning a presidential candidate’s true beliefs. Voting records are at the

» View the article

 
 
Posted: 26 February 2008 03:08 PM   [ Ignore ]  [ # 1 ]  
E. Burke
Total Posts:  917
Joined  2007-12-22

Thanks for these articles on Samantha Power. When I first encountered her in a gushing Salon interview, it was dread at first sight.

 Signature 

Senator Clinton, if you had known then what you know now, would you still have married Bill?

 
 
Posted: 26 February 2008 09:58 PM   [ Ignore ]  [ # 2 ]  
Voter
Total Posts:  14
Joined  2007-04-29

Paul writes that Walt and Mearshimer are “no longer willing to defend” the idea that the Israeli lobby pushed the U.S. into the Iraq war. The link that he provides does not support this claim, however. I was expecting some sort of mea culpa or some “backing down” on the part of Walt and Mearshimer, but in fact all they do is accuse others of mischaracterizing and overstating their claims and then restate the idea that the lobby was significant in the leadup to the war. They say that others are “accusing us of ... suggesting that the lobby bears sole responsibility for the Bush administration’s decision to invade Iraq. But that is not what we said”. They finish that same paragraph by saying “there is abundant evidence that the neo-conservatives and other groups within the lobby played a central role in making the case for war”.

If you read Paul’s post without clicking the link you get the impression that they have somehow rethought or changed their position, but the link does not demonstrate this in the least.

 
 
 

You need to be logged in to reply. Please Login or Register