Of COURSE ...
A “conflict of interest” exists. The NY Times thrives on insider information, leaked national secrets, and even hearsay to make whatever left-wing point will enable DhimmiCrats to rule the country and provide even more plush and comfortable treatment of the enemy.
Eugene Fidell’s amicus brief, that his wife gushed over, can be found here in a pdf file:
http://tinyurl.com/24popt
WARNING: This is simply standard fare from the usual suspects - “Human Rights First“, “Human Rights Watch“, the “American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committeeâ€, AND the “Socialist Workers Partyâ€, among others. Are you getting the drift YET?
The Summary, beginning on page 15, states the desire for an Independent Court to rule on the legality of “Executive Detentionâ€.
The brief maintains that the detainees are imprisoned based upon “hearsay by bounty huntersâ€, and that said imprisonment is “Kafkaesqueâ€.
The brief goes on to lament the suspension of Habeas Corpus, the violation of the Separation of Powers ... blah, blah, blah … ALL standard radical left-wing fare.
Where I come from, people like Ms. Linda are referred to as disingenuous, agenda-driven whöres. Which I suppose pretty much sums up not only the New York Times, but the MSM in general.
Enjoy the read. It would be downright comical were it not so dangerous to America and her security.
.