Rod Dreher: “The company Obama has kept”
Posted: 11 May 2008 01:39 PM

This post's average rating is:

  • 3 stars out of 5 in 2 vote(s)
  [ Ignore ]  
W. Churchill
Total Posts:  3827
Joined  2007-04-07

...
Forty years ago this month, Paris exploded in left-wing student riots that led to a nationwide general strike. The revolutionary fervor of France’s soixante-huitards (’68ers) spread widely, including to American campuses. If you’re wondering when the Good ‘60s of peace, love and civil rights gave way to the Bad ‘60s of anarchy and violence, May 1968 is as good a historical pivot point as any ... the restless spirit of ‘68 haunts this year’s presidential campaign, especially the White House bid of Mr. Obama, who, having pretty much missed the ‘60s – “Civil rights, sexual revolution, Vietnam War. Those all sort of passed me by,” he told The Atlantic’s Andrew Sullivan last year – was supposed to take us beyond those divisive traumas.

It’s not working out that way. His former pastor the Rev. Jeremiah Wright is an unreconstructed ‘60s radical, a fire-breathing disciple of James Cone’s period-piece black liberation theology. Mr. Obama wrote in his 1995 autobiography, Dreams From My Father, about his attraction to the leftist pastor’s church as a vehicle for social change. If black nationalism would uplift the race, he wrote, “then the hurt it might cause well-meaning whites, or the inner turmoil it caused people like me, would be of little consequence.”

That’s a remarkable admission of a racialized “ends justify the means” morality. It helps explain why Mr. Obama was willing to stick with a crackpot like Dr. Wright. It also might explain why an up-and-coming Barack Obama found nothing particularly wrong with rubbing political elbows with Bill Ayers, the Chicago university professor and onetime fugitive member of the revolutionary, communist Weather Underground.

...

[The soixante-huitards] may have failed at revolution, but they succeeded in changing the culture. (A famous soixante-huitard slogan: “Live without limits, and enjoy without restraint.") They did so in large part by, to use the Marxist Antonio Gramsci’s phrase, “marching through the institutions.” Pulpits. Professorships. Publishing and media. And in some cases, politics.

It’s not “guilt by association” to inquire to what extent Mr. Obama – whose moral and political conscience was shaped by his education at elite universities, his street activism and his tutelage at Dr. Wright’s knee – shares the views and assumptions of the soixante-huitards. In terms of style, he’s plainly not one of them. But his deeply liberal voting record marks him as at least a fellow traveler.

...

Mr. Obama’s radical baggage is more politically damaging because it deflates the hope many voters invested in him. He was once the man to deliver American politics from the storm and stress of the ‘60s generation – “Goodbye to all that,” as The Atlantic headlined Mr. Sullivan’s much-read pre-primary encomium to Mr. Obama’s transformational potential.

Not yet, alas. Against his own conscience, the ambitious but insecure young Mr. Obama compromised with the malevolent spirit of ‘68 for the sake of worldly gain. For the consequences are not proving to be as little as he expected.

Said the Devil to Faust: “In the end, you are exactly – what you are.” Yes.

Link: http://tinyurl.com/63z2ml

 Signature 

"… a far left candidate in the tradition of George McGovern, albeit without McGovern’s military and political record ... in the tradition of Michael Dukakis, albeit without Dukakis’s executive experience as governor ... in the tradition of John Kerry, albeit without Kerry’s record of years of service in the Senate ... an unvetted candidate in the tradition of Jimmy Carter, albeit without Jimmy Carter’s religious integrity.” --- W. Bennett re Sen. Obama

 
 
Posted: 11 May 2008 03:39 PM   [ Ignore ]  [ # 1 ]

This post's average rating is:

  • 3 stars out of 5 in 2 vote(s)
 
R. Limbaugh
Total Posts:  6695
Joined  2006-11-09

If black nationalism would uplift the race, he wrote, “then the hurt it might cause well-meaning whites, or the inner turmoil it caused people like me, would be of little consequence.”

Can’t make an omelet without breaking a few eggs, eh?

Obama speaks of uplifting the Black race, despite the hurt it might cause Whites, and some doubt remains about his tendancy toward racism?

There’s so much wrong about this guy, it would take many more words than these to unpack the whole bag.  For anyone to suggest Obama will slide to the center, dumping the marxists and the other radical left, fuggedabowdit.

 Signature 

“Under certain circumstances, profanity provides a relief denied even to prayer.” - Mark Twain

 
 
Posted: 11 May 2008 05:36 PM   [ Ignore ]  [ # 2 ]

This post's average rating is:

  • 3 stars out of 5 in 2 vote(s)
 
R. Limbaugh
Total Posts:  6168
Joined  2007-04-29
Pandora - 11 May 2008 03:39 PM


For anyone to suggest Obama will slide to the center, dumping the marxists and the other radical left, fuggedabowdit.

Certainly Obama will not dump the marxists or other radical left. This is where he feels most at home, with his peers.

 Signature 

"Globalization and technology and automation all weaken the position of workers,” he said, and a strong government hand is needed to assure that wealth is distributed more equitably.” Karl Marx Obama

“The truth is, in order to get things like universal health care and a revamped education system, then someone is going to have to give up a piece of their pie so that someone else can have more’.” —Michelle Marx Obama

 
 
Posted: 11 May 2008 06:45 PM   [ Ignore ]  [ # 3 ]

This post's average rating is:

  • 3 stars out of 5 in 2 vote(s)
 
A. Lincoln
Total Posts:  9081
Joined  2007-03-24

I read a post somewhere on this forum stating Obama would “tack” towards the center now.

WTF???

Obama is so far out of touch with America. Then we hear the Obammunists bleating, “how do you explain all his victories over Hillary?”

Hello! McFly! It’s a little thing called Hillary’s HUGE unfavorable ratings. Until Obama’s campaign began it’s decent towards self-immolation, Hillary WAS the preferred candidate to run against McCain.

IF Obama wins the nomination, EVERYTHING will be brought out for dissection before America. If you liked the way Gibson and Stephanopolis caused Obama to stammer and choke, wait until September.

How will the left muzzle Michelle, and Ayers, and Wright, and Hezbollah, and FARC, and limousine liberals, and rabid moonbats…

 Signature 


Haneek rabbak - - Nanat sag suk mizaneh! - - Islam: Religion of Evil!

“To ERR is human, to FORGIVE divine. HOWEVER, neither is Marine Corps Policy.”

:coolgrin:

 
 
Posted: 11 May 2008 09:37 PM   [ Ignore ]  [ # 4 ]  
B. Goldwater
Total Posts:  2352
Joined  2006-12-30

After more than seven years of Bushism, this country has had enough.  It is moving back to the left, whether you reactionaries like it or not.  And Obama is riding the wave.  Deal with it!

 Signature 

“Deliver me, O Lord, from evil men; preserve me from the violent men, who plan evil things in their hearts; they continually gather together for war.”
--Psalm 140

 
 
Posted: 11 May 2008 11:32 PM   [ Ignore ]  [ # 5 ]  
W. Churchill
Total Posts:  3449
Joined  2007-03-02
Roy Rogers - 11 May 2008 06:45 PM

I read a post somewhere on this forum stating Obama would “tack” towards the center now.

WTF???

Obama is so far out of touch with America. Then we hear the Obammunists bleating, “how do you explain all his victories over Hillary?”

Hello! McFly! It’s a little thing called Hillary’s HUGE unfavorable ratings. Until Obama’s campaign began it’s decent towards self-immolation, Hillary WAS the preferred candidate to run against McCain.

IF Obama wins the nomination, EVERYTHING will be brought out for dissection before America. If you liked the way Gibson and Stephanopolis caused Obama to stammer and choke, wait until September.

How will the left muzzle Michelle, and Ayers, and Wright, and Hezbollah, and FARC, and limousine liberals, and rabid moonbats…

I read that thread, too.  In fact, I read it twice.  It’s puzzling.  I’m baffled as to why anyone would think that Obama is planning to dump the left and “tack” to the center.  To what end?  Will Obama one day annouce that:

1. He doesn’t think he should raise taxes after all.

2. He won’t end the war as he’s promised.

3. He’s decided that it wouldn’t be a good idea to appoint the most liberal supreme court justices he can find.

4. We don’t really need government funded national health care.

5. Free abortion on demand really isn’t such a good idea.

6. Maybe he won’t talk to Ahmadinejad and Kim Jong-il after all.

Pandora has it right.  Fuggedabowdit.

 Signature 

It will all become clear in the fullness of time.

 
 
 

You need to be logged in to reply. Please Login or Register