2 of 2
2

Thinking of starting a Vinyl collection
Posted: 30 March 2008 04:11 AM   [ Ignore ]  [ # 16 ]  
R. Limbaugh
Total Posts:  6715
Joined  2006-11-09

Marantz Quadraphonic 4-channel amp/receiver, with Dolby, for me, 1976, $861.

Still using it.

f36114xbvry.jpg

 Signature 

“Under certain circumstances, profanity provides a relief denied even to prayer.” - Mark Twain

 
 
Posted: 30 March 2008 09:13 AM   [ Ignore ]  [ # 17 ]  
The Gipper
Total Posts:  12628
Joined  2007-01-08
Pandora - 30 March 2008 04:11 AM

Marantz Quadraphonic 4-channel amp/receiver, with Dolby, for me, 1976, $861.

Still using it.

f36114xbvry.jpg

Kewl!

Marantz was high quality stuff.  The LAST U.S. maker of stereo equipment if I’m not mistaken.

The last time I took my 4-channel Kenwood in to be “cleaned and serviced”, the young technician was amazed.  I think he almost would have done it for free just for the privilege of working on it.

<chuckle>

Those FIVE-way 120 watt Sansui speakers of mine with the 13” woofers can still blow the windows out - with QUALITY!

Friends and acquaintances began shipping the stuff home in the late 1960s from Vietnam and gave us all our first taste of high quality equipment for few dollars.

My father has a collection of 78 rpm records that literally occupies an entire closet.  For HIM, nothing sounds better than his 1950s Magnavox “Hi-Fi”.  I never have been able to convince him that the newer stuff sounds better.

LOL

 Signature 

~(Ä)~ 1st Bn, 87th Inf: Vires Montesque Vincimus!

 
 
Posted: 31 March 2008 02:17 AM   [ Ignore ]  [ # 18 ]  
R. Limbaugh
Total Posts:  6715
Joined  2006-11-09

I’m still using the Marantz, Rocketman, but it is indeed on its last legs. 

Despite taking excellent care of it, the last time I took it in for repair, the guy did what he could (which wasn’t much) with spit and baling wire.  There just aren’t any parts, other than the tubes.

It’s breakin’ my heart, I swear. I’ve had that Marantz for 32 years.

 Signature 

“Under certain circumstances, profanity provides a relief denied even to prayer.” - Mark Twain

 
 
Posted: 31 March 2008 01:25 PM   [ Ignore ]  [ # 19 ]  
B. Goldwater
Total Posts:  2201
Joined  2006-11-08
vegastracon - 29 March 2008 04:58 PM

Rhino30 - 29 March 2008 03:10 AM
I decided you can’t get that character sound and feel from digital so I am going to start my very own vinyl collection. 

Keep in mind that you can transfer the “character sound and feel” to a digital format.

usb_turntable.jpg

I have an extensive collection of vinyl that I have digitally copied unaltered. Playback on the computer sounds exactly same as on the turntable. Scratches. Pops. Nearly all of the nuances are captured.

There are some good programs that take care of the scratches and pops.  And some work very well.

As for converting them all.  No.  Too lazy.  And let’s not kid ourselves.  The sound is subpar.  I don’t care how good your system is, with all the extremely produced, crappy sounding vinyl (a few get it right) it’s not worth it, when a HQ replacement is readily had in the nether regions of teh interwebs.  Only on a few that never made it to CD.  Most of my Head East LP’s comes to mind and until the past year, REO’s first album was never on CD.  99.9% of my LP collection has been released (somewhere in the world) on CD.

 Signature 

Space reserved for (insert tard here) to state that Obama did not say (insert exact quote here), and for you to say that Obama said (insert exact Obama quote here) is wing-nut demagoguery.

 
 
Posted: 31 March 2008 01:27 PM   [ Ignore ]  [ # 20 ]  
B. Goldwater
Total Posts:  2201
Joined  2006-11-08
Rhino30 - 29 March 2008 05:05 PM

vegastracon - 29 March 2008 04:58 PM
Rhino30 - 29 March 2008 03:10 AM
I decided you can’t get that character sound and feel from digital so I am going to start my very own vinyl collection. 

Keep in mind that you can transfer the “character sound and feel” to a digital format.

usb_turntable.jpg

I have an extensive collection of vinyl that I have digitally copied unaltered. Playback on the computer sounds exactly same as on the turntable. Scratches. Pops. Nearly all of the nuances are captured.

That is pretty neat vegas.  It really does not change a thing with the sound?  I think I will stick to my Dad’s old record player he gave me...it brings back good memories when I clean the needle.  How much do one of those digital record player doohickies cost bye the way?

You can use your own turntable.  Go from the tape out jacks of your amp, into your soundcard.  Have some recording software, and presto.  Ready to go.

 Signature 

Space reserved for (insert tard here) to state that Obama did not say (insert exact quote here), and for you to say that Obama said (insert exact Obama quote here) is wing-nut demagoguery.

 
 
Posted: 31 March 2008 01:45 PM   [ Ignore ]  [ # 21 ]  
B. Goldwater
Total Posts:  2201
Joined  2006-11-08
Pandora - 30 March 2008 04:11 AM

Marantz Quadraphonic 4-channel amp/receiver, with Dolby, for me, 1976, $861.

Still using it.

f36114xbvry.jpg

Speaking of which, shoddy vinyl… And I know.  I’ve listened to my vinyl versions of the Moodies Core 7 over and over and over… They don’t come remotely close, to the new CD remixes.  So much detail has been brought out that it’s like listening to them for the first time.

Breathe deep the gathering gloom

/ahhhhh

 Signature 

Space reserved for (insert tard here) to state that Obama did not say (insert exact quote here), and for you to say that Obama said (insert exact Obama quote here) is wing-nut demagoguery.

 
 
Posted: 31 March 2008 01:52 PM   [ Ignore ]  [ # 22 ]  
The Gipper
Total Posts:  12628
Joined  2007-01-08

Well ... Yaaaaaaaaaa ...

BUT, for MANY years quadraphonic was THE best sound.

Is digital high def 7.1 surround sound better?  Of course it is!

That’s what my video system is hooked up to.  The quad resides in my den.

.

 Signature 

~(Ä)~ 1st Bn, 87th Inf: Vires Montesque Vincimus!

 
 
2 of 2
2

You need to be logged in to reply. Please Login or Register